'Natural Condoms' for oxy-morons
I noticed something the other day that, if it wasn't so tragic, could have made me laugh out loud. What could this be, you wonder?
A vending machine advertising 'Natural Condoms' no less. I fantasise about someone daring to take such a manufacturer to court under the Trade Descriptions Act, but suspect it won't happen, compelling me instead to draw my vast readership's attention to yet another example of the World's oxymoronisms (more to come on other examples later...).
Condoms cannot be described as 'natural' for the following reasons:
- Condoms do not naturally exist, They don't grow on trees, they can't be germinated on a windowsill. They are not natural objects.
- Condoms are not a natural part of human physiology. One is not born with one attached. They are not a 'second skin'. They are not a skin at all. They are not natural.
- They are not a natural part of sex. On the contrary, they ruin sex, they change it, pervert it, disorder it...whatever word is more comfortable for you to use - it all means the same. Condom-sex is not sex as it is intended and created to be. Condoms, therefore, go against nature.
- Condoms are not natural to love-making. They purposely bring a 'barrier' between a man and a woman, thereby preventing their one-flesh union. You cannot be truly united if you have a barrier between you that you've purposely put there.
- Condoms are not a natural way of preventing pregnancy. On the contrary, they are anything but. They are designed to work against nature, not with it. The natural end of sexual union is openness to the conception of life. That's the primary end of sex! That's nature. A natural way of preventing pregnancy is to not have a sexual union. Or to have one when you are in a naturally infertile time. In other words, follow the nature of your body. And keep sex as sex is. According to nature!
- Condoms typically contain spermicides which actively destroy healthy sperm. That's against nature, too.
- Condoms are not a natural way of protecting against sexually transmitted diseases. The only 100% way to do that is to not have sex. You want to really love your spouse? Don't have sex if you have an STD. The act of sex is intended to be an act of married love. If there's a risk that you can infect your wife by the act of sex...can it still therefore be the most loving act you can do together? A more loving act would surely be to abstain and remove the risk entirely. If you want to reduce the risk of getting knocked down by a train, don't stand on the tracks. No matter how fun it might be. Find another way of enjoying yourself!
So...'natural condoms'? I rest my case.

